Warning: There are an increasing number of fraudulent websites and emails that impersonate FENS. We would like to alert all our members, delegates, and exhibitors to possible scams. We strongly advise you to use only the official FENS online registration and accommodation for your bookings, and not to trust emails offering attendee lists.

NE10 - Are we equipped to work interdisciplinarily? - On the lack of philosophical education for neuroscientists (18:45-20:30)

How can neuroscientists benefit from extending their expertise into philosophical realms? Philosophical thinking tradition excels in the analysis of arguments, the reflection on modes of justification, and the elaboration of limits of statements or concepts, which can expand the horizon of each neuroscientist. Sounds too theoretical? By means of concrete examples from scientific practice, we will show how interdisciplinary projects strongly benefit from conceptual and philosophical input.

Start

July 10, 2022 - 6:45 pm

End

July 10, 2022 - 8:30 pm

Address

Paris Expo Porte de Versailles   View map

The human brain is the most complex organ of the body, more so, the most complex known structure in the universe. Owing to this complexity, studying its function, anatomy, and development and how it influences behaviour and mental processes clearly requires research at various levels and thus the cooperation of many disciplines.

Despite neuroscientist regularly interact with natural scientists from different disciplines, an exchange between the fields of neurosciences and philosophy has been scarce. This is surprising as neuroscientists and philosophers should be considered obvious dialogue partners due to their common interests in the understanding of cognition, thinking, and the human mind, but personal exchange and collaborative efforts are hardly put into practice. We are convinced that this type of interdisciplinarity will become increasingly important in brain research, also because international funding bodies progressively support particularly interdisciplinary project categories. However, such cooperation necessitates additional capacities and a certain background knowledge, which unfortunately is often not provided by the national and international education programs, Thus, it appears that neuroscience unintentionally limits its own possibilities by disregarding an important area of fruitful collaborations.

How can neuroscientists benefit from extending their expertise into philosophical realms? Philosophical thinking tradition excels in the analysis of arguments, the reflection on modes of justification, and the elaboration of limits of statements or concepts, which can expand the horizon of each neuroscientist.

Sounds too theoretical? By means of concrete examples from scientific practice, we will show how interdisciplinary projects strongly benefit from conceptual and philosophical input. The study of the human brain needs novel theoretical frameworks at the interface between neuroscience and philosophy that, in parallel with technical innovations, will help progressing the field beyond its current limitations. These theoretical frameworks will foster the formulation of innovative hypotheses to understand the complexity of the brain and the mind, leading to the definition of scientific concepts and the critical assessment of scientific assumptions. This will improve the precision and utility of scientific approaches and lead to novel questions and experimental investigations.

WARNING

There is an increasing number of fake websites and emails claiming to offer registration, hotel services, or registration lists. We would like to alert all members, delegates and exhibitors to be aware of possible scams, and only use trusted online services for bookings (click here to learn more).

Registration to the Forum is possible only via the Forum website.

Organised by

Hosted by

Logo of the Societe des Neurosciences
TOP